Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hilton Mincy v. North County Correctional Faci, et al
as 22-55090
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HILTON MINCY
Defendant / Appellee:
NORTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NCCF, NORTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY SUPERINTENDENT, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and others
Jones v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv01028
Defendant:
Warden, John and Jane Doe 1-50 and John and/or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Friar v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00428
Defendant:
Collette Peters, Jeff Darcy, Kevin Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Thomas Friar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolon v. Migliori et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Defendant:
John & Jane Does A-Z, Kevin G. Shea, Grant W. Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio V Rolon and Antonio V. Rolon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hilton Mincy v. Los Angeles County Sheriff et al
as 2:2019cv04867
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Sheriff Dept., Deputy Sheriff Ulloa, Deputy Sheriff Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Hilton Mincy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMONS v. BROWN et al
as 5:2018cv06890
Plaintiff:
Melvin Joseph Simmons
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA, Director Will Lightbourne, Michael Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Almond v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00440
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Sharon Almond
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Ted Sakai , State of Hawaii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCright v. Beamer et al
as 2:2017cv00942
Defendant:
5 John and 5 Jane Does, Dr. Leland Beamer, J. Dafoe and others
Plaintiff:
Larry McCright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deshawn D. Darby v. Los Angeles Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2016cv08711
Defendant:
Ms. Carter, Ms. Carter, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Deshawn D. Darby
Smith v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2014cv00432
Defendant:
State of Hawaii , Mark Patterson , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata and others
Plaintiff:
Stormy Rae Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
