Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Smith v. Lopez et al
as 5:2022cv02779
Plaintiff:
Jason Smith
Defendant:
Jesus Lopez, Humberto Vera, Joshua Peffley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton et al v. Patterson et al
as 4:2021cv08545
Plaintiff:
William Milton, Shelton Adams, Robert Blackwell and others
Petitioner:
William Pardue
Defendant:
Ronald R. Patterson, State of California, Craig Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Scott v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2020cv01820
Petitioner:
Shaheed Scott, Sr. and Rodney L. Scott
Respondent:
D. Artis, R. L. Briggs, G. Thumser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ford v. Piatt et al
as 2:2018cv03220
Defendant:
J Meeks, A Harrington, T Scheidman and others
Plaintiff:
Jourdyn K Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruben F. Martinez v. L. Scott et al
as 2:2018cv08133
Plaintiff:
Ruben F. Martinez
Defendant:
L. Scott, Bravo, J. Castelo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaheed Scott, Sr. v. Robert Fox, et al
as 18-15998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAHEED SCOTT, Sr., AKA Rodney L. Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT FOX, GARY THUMSER, Cheif Deputy Warden, ANGEL PAYAN, Correctional Case Records Manager and others
Steven Scott v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 17-17312
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN L. SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JO GENTRY, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02289
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ruben Febronio Martinez v. L. Scott et al
as 2:2017cv06313
Defendant:
L. Scott, Brand, Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Febronio Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv01592
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Steven L. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
