Cases 1 - 10 of 346
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024at00787
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McElmeel v. Perlow et al
as 6:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Samuel Peter McElmeel
Defendant:
Patricia W. Perlow, Eric T Knapp, Spencer Gwartney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ledford v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Dylan Joseph Ledford
Defendant:
Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whittenberg v. Bureau of Prisons Western Regional Office et al
as 5:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Lane Whittenberg
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons Western Regional Office, Dennis M. Wong and USP Victorville Property Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Knapp et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Erick T Knapp, Lane County DAs Office and Springfield PD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County Adult Corrections
as 6:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County Adult Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County DA's Office
as 6:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County DA's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. DA's Office et al
as 6:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
DA's Office, Erik T. Knap, Judge McAlpine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Parlow et al
as 6:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Patricia Parlow, Lane County DAs Office, Erick Knapp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
