Cases 1 - 10 of 64
(PC) Chavez v. St. Andre et al
as 2:2024cv01384
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Chavez
Defendant:
Rob St. Andre, Mitchell Knedler, Darrow Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ray Armijo v. Edward Borla
as 8:2024cv00719
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Armijo
Respondent:
Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuqua v. Thornell
as 3:2023cv08621
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15888
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
Michael Fuqua v. David Shinn, et al
as 23-15498
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNKNOWN PARTY
(PC) Fowler v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Fowler
Defendant:
Miller, J. Begines and Bieniaviaes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Ray Bredemier v. Theresa Cisneros
as 5:2022cv02016
Appellant:
Michael Ray Bredemier
Respondent:
Theresa Cisneros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Ray Pitre v. B. Birkholz
as 2:2022cv07956
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Pitre
Respondent:
B. Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Watts v. Novak
as 1:2022cv00512
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Watts
Defendant:
Logan Novak, Deputy Steven Josephson, Corporal Kellan Feyerharm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fuqua #215717 v. Unknown Party
as 3:2022cv08018
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Fuqua
Respondent:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
