Cases 1 - 10 of 704
Price v. Holbrook et al
as 5:2024cv03474
Plaintiff:
Kevin Price
Defendant:
David Holbrook, Jesse Suarez and Shina Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Macejak v. Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) et al
as 2:2024cv00898
Plaintiff:
John Joseph Macejak
Defendant:
ODOC Agency, SRCI Prison, Jamie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson et al
as 2:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cano
Defendant:
S. Salmonson, Figueroa-Price and Appel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudder v. Price et al
as 2:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Brandy Lea Rudder
Defendant:
Sherri Price, Connie Price, Glen Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert E Martin v. Brandon Price
as 8:2024cv01118
Petitioner:
Robert Edwin Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Napa State Hospital et al
as 4:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Napa State Hospital and Fernando Cortez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Saini
as 4:2024cv02899
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Price
Defendant:
Amrit Saini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Martin v. Price
as 1:2024cv00565
Petitioner:
Robert E Martin
Respondent:
Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lucas v. Placer County Superior Court et al
as 2:2024cv01336
Petitioner:
David Lee Lucas
Respondent:
Placer County Superior Court and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Price v. Bean et al
as 2:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Edmond Paul Price
Respondent:
Jeremy Bean and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
