Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Pearson v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2023cv00045
Petitioner:
Chad Samuel William Pearson
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere, Attorney General of the State of Oregon and Ellen Rosenblum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Williams v. Sacramento Main Jail et al
as 2:2022cv02045
Petitioner:
Samuel Williams
Respondent:
Sacramento Main Jail and Sacramento District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Donaghe v. Patrisha Lashway, et al
as 17-35919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRISHA LASHWAY, JOHN CLAYTON, WILLIAM VAN HOOK and others
Williams v. CSP San Quentin et al
as 2:2011cv02526
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Samuel Williams
Defendant:
CSP San Quentin, CDCR, CSP Solano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Warden(s) CSP San Quentin et al
as 5:2010cv02146
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Samuel Williams
Defendant:
Warden(s) CSP San Quentin, Director(s) CDCR, Warden(s) CSP Solano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lewis v. Grounds
as 5:2010cv01037
Petitioner:
Samuel William Lewis
Respondent:
Randy Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samuel Lewis v. Ben Curry
as 08-17542
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
BEN CURRY, Warden
Samuel Donaghe v. Special Commitment Center, et al
as 08-35860
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE
Defendant - Appellee:
SPECIAL COMMITMENT CENTER and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF WASHINGTON
Donaghe v. Special Commitment Center et al
as 3:2008cv05491
Plaintiff:
Samuel William Donaghe
Defendant:
Special Commitment Center and WA Dept of Social and Health Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sam Donaghe v. Henry Richards
as 08-35244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL WILLIAM DONAGHE
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY RICHARDS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
