Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15892
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS, named as Timothy Olmos, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L RYAN, named as Charles Ryan, RICHARD PRATT, MARK SHIPMAN and others
Timothy Olmos v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-16804
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY PAUL OLMOS
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, RICHARD PRATT, MARK SHIPMAN and others
Shipman v. Washoe County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2021cv00419
Defendant:
Naphcare, Lauren Hull, Washoe County Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Jed Shipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipman v. Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv02412
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Shipman
Respondent:
Director of Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trejo v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv08098
Plaintiff:
Fernando Arnulfo Trejo, III
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shipman v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08212
Petitioner:
James Lawrence Shipman
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Olmos v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv03665
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Richard Pratt, Mark Shipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Craig Buchanan v. M. Spearman, et al
as 17-17001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CRAIG PAUL BUCHANAN
Defendant - Appellee:
M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, SHIPMAN, HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON and others
Buchanan v. Warden et al
as 1:2017cv00990
Plaintiff:
Craig Buchanan
Defendant:
Warden, Shipman, High Desert State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buchanan v. Warden et al
as 2:2017cv01497
Plaintiff:
Craig Buchanan
Defendant:
Warden, Shipman, High Desert State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
