Cases 1 - 10 of 35
(PC) Tellez v. Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tellez
Defendant:
K. Hixon, E. Cisneros and M. Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv02263
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, Eduardo Tomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Morales et al
as 2:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
Luz Maria Aguilar Morales, EduardoTomas Medina Mora Icaza, Lilia Monica Lopez Benitez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mackey v. Bloomfield et al
as 3:2022cv05105
Plaintiff:
Vincent Robert Mackey
Defendant:
Robert Bloomfield, Sgt. Baker, Lt. Teixiera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Tafoya v. Holbrook
as 1:2022cv00932
Petitioner:
Fidel Tafoya
Respondent:
David Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Braxton #149618 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Chad Everett Lamar Braxton and Chad Everett Braxton
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Bond, Unknown Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen v. Warden
as 5:2021cv01593
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen and Tafoya
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Gogol v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2020cv01397
Defendant:
R. Cavazos, J. Attschuler, M. Hernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Gogol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen v. Riverside Sheriffs Office et al
as 5:2020cv00957
Defendant:
Riverside Sheriffs Office and John Doe 1
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Vanleeuwen and Robert Michael Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv01557
Defendant:
Michael Garcia, Abigail Dillon, Bonnie Dumanis and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
