Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Robert Johnson v. Natalya Weigel
as 23-15813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
NATALYA WEIGEL, Provider/Doctor at SMU 1
Yokois v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Douglas D Yokois
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Larry Gann, Staci Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Watson v. P Gertz, et al
as 23-15450
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
P GERTZ, Administrative Director of Nursing, NATALYA WEIGEL, Health Care Provider/Doctor, previouslay named Natalie Weigel, aka per Doc 16 also known as Natalie Weigel, MAUREEN GAY, Health Care Provider/Doctor and others
Phillip Carson v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP LEE CARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, ADOC Director (Retired), RICHARD PRATT, Deputy Director of ADOC, PARKS, CO2 Unknown and others
Lummus #102598 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02079
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Lummus
Defendant:
David Shinn, S Oplinger, Brea Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Semaan #162908 v. Stewart et al
as 2:2022cv02080
Plaintiff:
Victor Joseph Semaan
Defendant:
Unknown Stewart, Natalya Weigel and Unknown Merriman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Weigel
as 2:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Charles Pruitt
Defendant:
Natalya Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mecham #157752 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Cade J Mecham
Defendant:
David Shinn, Larry Gann, Stacey Fife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson #349677 v. Weigel
as 2:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
N Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armenta #347230 v. Weigel
as 2:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Joseph T Armenta
Defendant:
N Weigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
