Cases 111 - 120 of 170
AMF Bowling Worldwide Incorporated v. Ramos et al
as 2:2011cv00156
Plaintiff:
AMF Bowling Worldwide Incorporated
Defendant:
Devon Ramos, John Thompson, Maria Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Castillo v. Thompson et al
as 4:2010cv05189
Plaintiff:
Daniel Castillo
Defendant:
Jeff Thompson and Alameda Collision Repair, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thompson v. APM Terminals Pacific Ltd.
as 3:2010cv04991
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thompson
Defendant:
APM Terminals Pacific Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. APM Terminals Pacific Ltd.
as 4:2010cv04991
Plaintiff:
Bryan Thompson
Defendant:
APM Terminals Pacific Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson v. Multidimension International, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01666
Defendant:
Multidimension International, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Airong Wang Thompson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Stanley Harris et al v. First Regional Bancorp et al
as 2:2010cv07164
Defendant:
Does, Fred M. Edwards, First Regional Bancorp and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Harris and Ted Pappas
Unknown:
Joseph H Meltzer and Joseph H Meltzer
Douglas Dejohn et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 2:2010cv07107
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., AT&T Services, Inc., AT&T, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Dejohn, Alex Franey, ROES and others
Miami Dolphins, Ltd. v. Fred Barnett et al
as 2:2010cv06521
Defendant:
Chidi Ahantou, Gene Atkins, Obafemi Ayambadejo and others
Plaintiff:
Miami Dolphins, Ltd.
Sharon Y Sosa et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA, et al
as 5:2010cv01098
Plaintiff:
Ankur Baishya, Irina Barbarov, Natalie Daliah Barrantes and others
Defendant:
Does and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Pamela Overfield et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 8:2010cv01085
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Jacobson, Claudia Ocegueda, Pamela Overfield and others
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
