Cases 1 - 6 of 6
York et al v. Dave & Buster's Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01130
Defendant:
Dave & Buster's Management Corporation Incorporated and Dave & Buster's Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Gery Pearson and Natasha York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Steven Buster v. Compensation Committee of the, et al
as 17-16566
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN K. BUSTER
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant:
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF MECHANICS BANK, MECHANICS BANK SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN and MECHANICS BANK, a California corporation
Banks v. Dave & Buster's of Oregon, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01754
Plaintiff:
Makenna Banks
Defendant:
Dave & Buster's Entertainment, Inc., Dave & Buster's Holdings, Inc., Dave & Buster's of Oregon, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Dave & Buster's Management Corporation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cherish Nunnally v. Dave and Busters Inc et al
as 8:2016cv00855
Defendant:
Dave and Busters Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Cherish Nunnally
Buster v. Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan et al
as 3:2016cv01146
Defendant:
Mechanics Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, Mechanics Bank and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Mechanics Bank
Plaintiff:
Buster and Steven K Buster
Special Master:
Laura C Hurtado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Dust Busters Air Quality Management, L.L.C.
as 2:2012cv00803
Defendant:
Dust Busters Air Quality Management, L.L.C.
Plaintiff:
Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Joint Pension Trust, Trustees Of The Construction Industry And Laborers Vacation Trust, Trustees Of The Southern Nevada Laborers Local 872 Training Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
