Labor Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Beldock et al v. Microsoft Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv01082
Plaintiff: Justin Beldock, Gordon Broward and Shaadi Nezami
Defendant: Microsoft Corporation, Board of Trustees of Microsoft Corporation, 401(K) Administrative Committee of the Microsoft Corporation Savings Plus 401(K) Plan and others
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Bracalente et al v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04417
Plaintiff: Robert Bracalente and Boris Gdalevich
Defendant: Cisco Systems, Inc., The Board of Trustees of Cisco Systems, Inc. and The Administrative Committee of the Cisco Systems, Inc. 401(K) Plan
Amicus Curiae: American Benefits Council, ERISA Industry Committee, American Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Michael Alves v. Hewlett-Packard Comprehensive Welfare Benefits Pla, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-55621
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL ALVES
Defendant / Appellee: HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPREHENSIVE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, an ERISA plan and HEWLETT-PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY, a corporation
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 10
Information System and Networks Corporation v. Sharon Heritage
as 2:2021cv07870
Plaintiff: INFORMATION SYSTEMS & NETWORKS CORPORATION and Information Systems and Networks Corporation
Defendant: SHARON HERITAGE, individually and as Executor of the ESTATE OF NICHOLAS LARSEN SAAKVITNE, the ESTATE of NICHOLAS L. SAAKVITNE, NICHOLAS L. SAAKVITNE, a law corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Lou v. Accenture United States Group Health Plan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv06741
Plaintiff: Albert B Lou and Albert B. Lou
Defendant: Accenture United States Group Health Plan, Accenture LLP, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Santos v. Minnesota Life Insurance Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv06707
Defendant: Minnesota Life insurance Company aka Securian Financial Group, Inc., Securian Financial Group, Inc., Apple Inc. Health and Welfare Benefit Plan (The Plan) and others
Plaintiff: Eva Marie Santos, Sam Chong and Samuel Chong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Norma Franchina v. Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian CIGNA Group Insurance, Policy No. FLK0960425 et al
as 2:2019cv04273
Defendant: Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian/CIGNA Group Insurance, Policy No. FLK0960425, an ERISA Plan; Life Insurance Company of North America, Life Insurance Company of North America and Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian CIGNA Group Insurance, Policy No. FLK0960425
Plaintiff: Ms Norma Franchina and Norma Franchina
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
The ERISA Industry Committee v. City of Seattle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01188
Plaintiff: The ERISA Industry Committee
Defendant: City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Lauren Von Blohn v. Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv04228
Plaintiff: Lauren von Blohn
Defendant: Blue Shield of California Life and Health Insurance Company, California Physician's Service, Inc. and California Physician's Service, Inc. a California corporation, in its capacity as ERISA-fiduciary insurer and administrator of the Charles M. Salter Associates Health and Welfare Plan doing business as Blueshield of California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
The ERISA Industry Committee v. Read
as 3:2017cv01605
Defendant: Tobias Read
Plaintiff: The ERISA Industry Committee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?