Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Edmond v. All My Sons Moving & Storage of Phoenix LLC
as 2:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Andre Ramon Edmond
Defendant:
All My Sons Moving & Storage of Phoenix LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Edmonds v. 1226Murr LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01914
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Edmonds
Defendant:
1226Murr LLC an Arizona company doing business as All-Star Grooming Pet Boarding Daycare & Training and Gordon Gage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Edmond Alvarez et al v. Safelite Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv07874
Plaintiff:
Edmond Alvarez and Thomas Newell
Defendant:
Safelite Group, Inc., Safelite Fulfillment, Inc., Safelite Glass Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mesachi v. Postmates Inc.
as 4:2020cv03046
Defendant:
Postmates Inc.
Plaintiff:
Edmond Mesachi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gilmore v. McMillan-Hendryx et al
as 2:2020at00344
Plaintiff:
Edmond Trent Gilmore
Defendant:
McMillan-Hendryx Incorporated, Deb C. Hall, Justin Hendryx and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gilmore v. McMillan-Hendryx, et al.
as 1:2020cv00483
Plaintiff:
Edmond Trent Gilmore
Defendant:
McMillan-Hendryx Incorporated, Deb C. Hall, Justin Hendryx and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Edmonds v. Amazon.com Inc et al
as 2:2019cv01613
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Logistics, Inc., Amazon.com Services, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Brady Edmonds
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Thondukolam et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03857
Defendant:
Ronald C Edmonds, Jeff M Fettig, DowDuPont, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David L Everett, William C Mallonee, Krishnan R Thondukolam and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Alvarado v. ZipRecruiter Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00865
Defendant:
ZipRecruiter Incorporated, Unknown Edmonds, Ian Siegel and others
Plaintiff:
Oscar Alvarado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
