Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Newsome v. Axos Bank et al
as 3:2020cv01424
Defendant:
Axos Bank and Axos Financial, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Taneasha Newsome
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Aaron Senne, et al v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Co, et al
as 17-16276
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AARON SENNE, MICHAEL LIBERTO, OLIVER ODLE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP., MIAMI MARLINS, L.P., SAN FRANCISCO BASEBALL ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Aaron Senne, et al v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Co, et al
as 17-16267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AARON SENNE, MICHAEL LIBERTO, OLIVER ODLE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP., MIAMI MARLINS, L.P., SAN FRANCISCO BASEBALL ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Aaron Senne, et al v. Kansas City Royals Baseball Co, et al
as 17-16245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AARON SENNE, MICHAEL LIBERTO, OLIVER ODLE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL CORP., MIAMI MARLINS, L.P., SAN FRANCISCO BASEBALL ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
Senne et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
as 3:2014cv00608
Plaintiff:
Lee Smith, Nick Giarraputo, Matt Frevert and others
Defendant:
Pittsburgh Baseball P'ship, Cleveland Indians Basebell Co., L.P., Baltimore Orioles, L.P. and others
Intervenor:
Cody Sedlock, Edwin Mateo, Luis Yarnel Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Newsom v. Benefit Recovery et al
as 1:2013cv00513
Plaintiff:
Cheryl R. Newsom
Defendant:
Benefit Recovery , John Does 1-10 and Doe Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rettler et al v. Newsom et al
as 2:2012cv02489
Plaintiff:
Louisa Rettler and David Hicks
Defendant:
Robert Newsom and Barbara Goodsell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Horton et al v. County of Sacramento
as 2:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Audrey Jones, Charles Rich, Shannon Eubanks and others
Defendant:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
