Cases 91 - 100 of 901
Neil Fox Parekh et al v. Abel Makkonen Tesfaye et al
as 2:2021cv07488
Plaintiff:
Neil Fox Parekh and Shyhi Henry Hsaio
Defendant:
Abel Makkonen Tesfaye, Adam King Feeney, Nicolas Alfredo Jaar and others
Petitioner:
Eric White
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Krafton, Inc. et al v. Apple Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00209
Defendant:
Moco Studios Private Limited, Apple Inc., Google, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Krafton, Inc. and PUBG Santa Monica, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Braden v. Life Ins. Co. of North America et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jessica Braden
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and Apple, Inc. Long Term Disability Benfit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Serrano v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Serrano
Defendant:
Apple Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dluzak v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dluzak
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Apple Inc. v. Alivecor, Inc.
as 4:2022cv07608
Plaintiff:
Apple Inc.
Defendant:
Alivecor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Cima v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2023cv00396
Plaintiff:
Julia Cima
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07668
Plaintiff:
Lauren Hughes and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
RICHARD et al v. TWITTER, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv09432
Plaintiff:
JACKSON RICHARD, JULIE BRIGGS and GREGG BUCHWALTER
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE, LLC, META PLATFORMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Parus Holdings Inc. v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2022cv07514
Plaintiff:
Parus Holdings, Inc.
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
