Cases 91 - 100 of 191
Uiese Mausali v. Office of the Attorney General of the United States
as 2:2015cv02012
Plaintiff:
Uiese Mausali
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Conmy v. Office of the Attorney General of the United States
as 2:2015cv00495
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eric Conmy
Defendant:
Office of the Attorney General of the United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00057
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Taylor v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-56630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM LOUIS TAYLOR
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States, U.S. Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Rickie Hulsey v. Carolyn W. Colvin et al
as 8:2014cv01361
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Carolyn W. Colvin, S.S Admin Offices and others
Plaintiff:
Rickie Hulsey
David Everist v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 14-35661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. EVERIST
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE, DONNA MICKLEY, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-35482
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reitz v. Federal Government, et al
as 3:2014cv00624
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Federal Government, President of the United States and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Mark Reitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01311
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Everist v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service et al
as 1:2014cv00199
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Director Dayne Barron, City of Medford, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
David D. Everist
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent - Right to Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
