Cases 91 - 100 of 167
John Powers v. Charles Keeton, et al
as 16-16398
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN JAY POWERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES KEETON, Warden, CCA/CADC, JOSE MARTINEZ, Assistant Health Services Administrator, CCA/CADC, AHKTAR HAMADI, Psychiatrist, CCA/CADC and others
Khamo v. Warden, et al.
as 2:2016cv01827
Plaintiff:
Fabian Khamo
Defendant:
Warden, Director, Bettencourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khamo v. Warden et al
as 3:2016cv01870
Plaintiff:
Fabian Khamo
Defendant:
Warden, Director, Bettencourt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodarte v. Schumming et al
as 6:2016cv00055
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodarte
Defendant:
Susan Schumming, Leroy Kirkegard, Candice Neubaur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. S.C.C. Mailroom et al
as 3:2015cv00630
Defendant:
Mr. Baca, Danae Clark, Northern Nevada Correctional Center Building #7 and Building #8 Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Ryan Eha v. Trust Account Office Staff et al
as 5:2015cv02553
Plaintiff:
David Ryan Eha
Defendant:
Mailroom Staff, Prison Law Library Legal Mail System Staff, Staff and others
Eclips v. Self et al
as 3:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Luna Eclipse
Defendant:
Jesse Self, Thomas, Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vartanpour v. Neven et al
as 2:2015cv00951
Defendant:
Calderwood, AWJ Hawell, Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
Rafik Vartanpour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Picozzi v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2015cv00816
Defendant:
5th Floor Sgts CCDC, 7th Floor Sgts., Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Picozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tia v. Sakai et al
as 1:2015cv00107
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Ted Sakai, Attorney General, The Department of, Dovie Borges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
