Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 91 - 100 of 148
Uromed Technology, Inc. et al v. Granger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv05242
Plaintiff: Uromed Technology, Inc. and Thomas F. Reiner
Defendant: Michael Y. Granger, Kenneth E. Feltman and Kenneth Feltman Insurance Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bruce Belodoff v. Netlist Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2007cv00677
Plaintiff: Bruce Belodoff
Defendant: Chun K Hong, Lee Kim and Netlist Inc
Consol Defendant: Nam Ki Hong, Thomas F Lagatta, Needham and Company LLC and others
Movant: Iron Workers Local No. 25 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Thomas Hale
as 10-35830
: In re: THOMAS F. HALE
Appellant: THOMAS F. HALE, Attorney at Law - Disciplinary Proceeding
Bernier et al v. Croteau et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01698
Plaintiff: Rejeanne M Bernier and Hans S. Croteau
Defendant: Jocelyn G Croteau, ICS Professional Services, Inc, Croteau Living Trust dated 4/6/2005 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainbow Business Solutions et al v. Merchant Services, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2010cv01993
Defendant: Rich Hahn, Joseph I. Sussman, P.C., Merchant Services, Inc and others
Plaintiff: Verena Baumgartner, Dietz Towing Inc, Volker Von Glasenapp and others
Not Classified By Court: Experian Corporation
Interested Party: Michael Han, Bradley C. Aldrich, Dr. Lori Clemens and others
Cross Defendant: Rover Enterprises, Inc., Anthony Kutscher, Jr., Jason Moore and others
Cross Claimant: Protege Investments, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, et al
as 10-15951
Plaintiff - Appellant: HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant - Appellee: ALBERT ANGIOLI, BURNELL ANGIOLI, MULTIMATIC CORPORATION and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee: TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant: CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-15607
Plaintiff - Appellant: HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant: ALBERT ANGIOLI and BURNELL ANGIOLI
Defendant - Appellee: MULTIMATIC CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC DRY CLEANING MACHINE CORPORATION, MULTIMATIC LLC and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellee: TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant: CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Hinds Investments, L.P., et al v. Team Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 10-15605
Plaintiff - Appellee: HINDS INVESTMENTS, L.P.
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: PATRICIA MCLAUGHLIN, Trustee of the Thomas F. Hinds and Mary Jane Hinds Living Trust
Defendant: ALBERT ANGIOLI, BURNELL ANGIOLI, MULTIMATIC CORPORATION and others
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant: TEAM ENTERPRISES, INC.
Third-party-defendant - Appellee: CSK AUTO, INC., DBA Kragen Auto Parts and COOPER INDUSTRIES LTD
Rafton v. Rydex Series Funds et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv01171
Plaintiff: James Rafton
Defendant: Rydex Series Funds, Padco Advisors Inc., Rydex Distributors, I c. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Uromed Technology, Inc. et al v. Reiner et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00857
Plaintiff: Uromed Technology, Inc., Uromed Technology, Inc., Uromed Technology, Inc. and others
Defendant: Thomas F. Reiner, Thomas F. Reiner, Denise A. Brewer-Reiner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?