Cases 151 - 160 of 473
Tate v. Pacific Steel & Recycling Benefits Plan
as 9:2019cv00148
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Pacific Steel & Recycling Benefits Plan, Pacific Steel & Recycling, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Lafontaine et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert Lafontaine and Carol Lafontaine
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, ABC Companies 1-3, Store No. 2455 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lawrence v. Ravalli County et al
as 9:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Tim Campbell, Judy Stanberry, Reed Scott and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Joe Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins et al v. Ravalli County et al
as 9:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
Crystal Combs, Kenneth Jenkins and Paul Jenkins
Defendant:
Reed Scott, Lewis and Clark County, Ravalli County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rahn v. Montana Rail Link Benefit Plan et al
as 9:2019cv00141
Defendant:
Washington Corporations, John Does 1-5 and Montana Rail Link Benefit Plan
Plaintiff:
Wendy Rahn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
ViralHog, LLC v. Jackson et al
as 9:2019cv00138
Defendant:
O'Shea Jackson, Sr., Derrick Montez Jones, UMG Recordings, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
ViralHog, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv00124
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Gillespie et al v. The Timken Company et al
as 4:2019cv00051
Plaintiff:
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Roxy Gillespie and Wayne Gillespie
Defendant:
The Timken Company, CNH Industrial America, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.