Cases 11 - 20 of 669
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Miller, et al. v. ManPow, LLC
as 24-548
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATTHEW MILLER, DONALD K. BAKE and SAAD KHAN
Defendant / Appellant:
MANPOW, LLC
Duraisamy v. Sairam Babu, et al.
as 24-457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NAGARAJAN DURAISAMY
Defendant / Appellee:
PRADEEP PULI RUKMANGATHA SAIRAM BABU, KOUSALYA NAGARAJAN, HCL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED and others
Khan v. Madsen et al
as 5:2023cv06141
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Khan
Defendant:
Haley Madsen, Arlene Stephens, J. A. Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller, et al. v. ManPow, LLC
as 24-289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
United States of America ex rel. MATTHEW MILLER, DONALD K. BAKE and SAAD KHAN, relators
Defendant / Appellee:
MANPOW, LLC, a Texas limited liability corporation
Khan et al v. Covenant Aviation Security
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Jesenia Khan, Gabriela Isabel Castillo and GIC
Defendant:
Covenant Aviation Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Martinez et al v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez and We Are Not Invisible
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Howard Lacy, David Ramirez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02814
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Khan v. ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv06172
Plaintiff:
Farooq Khan
Defendant:
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc., Pasquale Romano and Rex S. Jackson
Amazon.Com Inc. et al v. Wasim et al
as 4:2023cv05580
Plaintiff:
Amazon.Com Inc. and Amazon Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Wasim Umer, Teknobyl Digital LLC, Umer Wasim and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
