Cases 11 - 20 of 74
Andre Wong, et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., et al
as 22-56113
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE WONG, AMADO MUNOZ, CAROLYN HEIER and others
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., a Delaware corporation and DOES, 1 through 50, inclusive
Vargas-Gaitan v. Garland
as 22-753
Petitioner:
SONIA ARELY VARGAS-GAITAN, RICARDO ESEQUIEL VELASQUEZ VARGAS, KATERIN TATIANA VELASQUEZ VARGAS and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Shikeb Saddozai v. Ron Davis, et al
as 20-17519
Defendant / Appellee:
C. SMITH, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison, SERRINTINO, Correctional Officer, San Quentin State Prison, RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State Prison and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Jaime Gaitan-Alfonso v. William Barr
as 20-73052
Petitioner:
JAIME ORLANDO GAITAN-ALFONSO
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
(PC) Melendez, et al. v. Diaz, et al.
as 1:2020cv01393
Defendant:
Warden Rosemary Ndoh, CDCR Secretary Ralph Diaz, Avenal State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
Emerson Gaitan, John Melendez, Phillip Bernard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendez et al v. Diaz et al
as 1:2020at00737
Plaintiff:
Eric Hernadez, Jose Canalez, Jr., Phillip Bernard and others
Defendant:
Mr. Ralph Diaz, Avenal State Prison, Ms. Rosemary Ndoh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Gaitan v. William Barr
as 19-72360
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Petitioner:
CARLOS ARIAS GAITAN
Miller v. Cabral et al
as 5:2019cv03964
Defendant:
Gloria Castaneda, Gloria Cabral, Gloria Cabral Robles and others
Plaintiff:
Kurt Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
