Cases 11 - 20 of 83
(PC) Jones Slaise v. Merced County Sheriff, et al.
as 1:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Keythan Michael Jones Slaise
Defendant:
Merced County Sheriff, Vernon H. Warnke, Corey M. Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RLI Insurance Company v. Silveira et al
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
RLI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gabriel Silveira and Maria Silveira
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Silveira v. Garland
as 22-959
Petitioner:
CRISTIANO TAVARES DA SILVEIRA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Silveira v. Villalovo et al
as 2:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Hansel E Silveira and Hansel E. Silveira Castellanos
Defendant:
Sandra Villalovo, Angie LNU, Bacaro Apartamentos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Juan Vazquez v. E. Conannan, et al
as 21-16731
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN R. VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
E. CONANNAN, J. SILVEIRA, SRN II, G. KAMON, Medical Doctor and others
Juan Vazquez v. E. Conannan, et al
as 21-16222
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN R. VAZQUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
E. CONANNAN, J. SILVEIRA, SRN II, G. KAMON, Medical Doctor and others
Defendant:
I. MATHOS, Nurse Practitioner
Hernandez et al v. Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
as 4:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
Michael Caldwell, Phyllis Accornero, Paul Naepflin and others
Defendant:
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DeAnthony Brooks v. C.M.C et al
as 2:2020cv10374
Defendant:
Mike Dawson, Aaron Collins, C.M.C and others
Plaintiff:
DeAnthony J. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Shane Silveira v. J. Gastelo
as 2:2020cv08021
Petitioner:
Eric Shane Silveira
Respondent:
J. Gastelo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
