Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 717
Ramon Torres Hernandez, et al v. Julie Su, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-35582
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAMON TORRES HERNANDEZ and FAMILIAS UNIDAS POR LA JUSTICIA, AFL-CIO, a labor organization
Defendant / Appellee: JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WASHINGTON STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT and others
Amicus Curiae: UNITED FARM WORKERS OF AMERICA
Evans Hotels, LLC, et al v. Unite Here! Local 30, et al
as 23-55728
Plaintiff / Appellee: EVANS HOTELS, LLC, a California limited liability company, BH PARTNERSHIP LP, a California limited partnership and EHSW, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant: UNITE HERE! LOCAL 30, BRIGETTE BROWNING, an individual, SAN DIEGO COUNTY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO and others
Asing v. Hawaii Government Employees Association, Local 152, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (HGEA/AFSCME Local 152) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff: Christine Asing
Defendant: Hawaii Government Employees Association, Local 152, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO (HGEA/AFSCME Local 152) and Doe Defendants 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ramon Torres Hernandez, et al v. Julie Su, et al
as 23-35525
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAMON TORRES HERNANDEZ and FAMILIAS UNIDAS POR LA JUSTICIA, AFL-CIO, a labor organization
Defendant / Appellee: JULIE A. SU, in her official capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WASHINGTON STATE EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DEPARTMENT and others
Evans Hotels, LLC, et al v. Unite Here! Local 30, et al
as 23-55692
Plaintiff / Appellant: EVANS HOTELS, LLC, a California limited liability company, BH PARTNERSHIP LP, a California limited partnership and EHSW, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee: UNITE HERE! LOCAL 30, BRIGETTE BROWNING, an individual, SAN DIEGO COUNTY BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL, AFL-CIO and others
Tolentino v. Saito
as 1:2023cv00286
Plaintiff: Arthur B. Tolentino, Rick V. Paulino, Jeanine Lum and others
Defendant: Paul Saito, Glenn Saito, Sam Fujikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Tolentino v. Saito We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00280
Plaintiff: Arthur B. Tolentino, Rick V. Paulino, Jeanine Lum and others
Defendant: Paul Saito, Glenn Saito, Sam Fujikawa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Rutherford v. Arizona Public Service Company et al
as 2:2023cv00899
Plaintiff: David S Rutherford
Defendant: Arizona Public Service Company, Local 387 Electrical Workers Building Association Union, APS Apprenticeship Program and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, Its Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Southern Gateway Productions Services, LLC
as 2:2023cv03883
Petitioner: International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States, Its Territories and Canada, AFL-CIO, CLC
Respondent: Southern Gateway Productions Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0001 U.S. Arbitration Act
Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc. v. United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 135, AFL-CIO, CLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00413
Plaintiff: Spreckels Sugar Company, Inc.
Defendant: United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 135, AFL-CIO, CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations
Type: Labor Labor: Other

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?