Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Ascencio-De Gomez v. Garland
as 22-357
Petitioner:
ANDERSON ISAI GOMEZ-ASCENCIO and SARA ASCENCIO-DE GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mwasi v. Ascencio
as 3:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
K. Mwasi
Defendant:
T. Ascencio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abraham Ascencio et al v. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power et al
as 2:2021cv05901
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ascencio, Maria De Jesus Puentes, Karen Baca and others
Petitioner:
Southern California Edison Company
Defendant:
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, City of Los Angeles, Spectrum Fire Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ascencio Mejia v. Garland
as 21-421
Petitioner:
EDGARDO ANTONIO ASCENCIO MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Jackson v. Taylor et al
as 3:2021cv03660
Defendant:
Todan Ascencio and Matthew Taylor
Plaintiff:
Arthur D. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Johnson v. Ron Davis, et al
as 21-15087
Defendant / Appellee:
RON DAVIS, Warden, T. ALLEN, T. LEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Edgardo Ascencio Mejia v. William Barr
as 20-72995
Petitioner:
EDGARDO ANTONIO ASCENCIO MEJIA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Rojas
as 6:2020cv01603
Defendant:
Jose De Jesus Rojas, Jose De Jesus Rojas-Ascencio and Jose De Jesus Rojas also known as Jose De Jesus Rojas-Ascencio doing business as Casa Rojas
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Jorge Ascencio Gonzalez v. William Barr
as 20-72693
Petitioner:
JORGE ALBERTO ASCENCIO GONZALEZ, AKA Jorge Alberto Ascencio Gonzalez, AKA Jose Pacheco Martinez
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
