Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Charles Boyd et al v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2014cv00336
Defendant:
Access Securepak, Alverez, Amador and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Boyd, John Brown, Robert Castro and others
Blythe, Indio, RPDC, Smith, SWBC:
Riverside County Jail System
Overton v. Access Securepak et al
as 3:2013cv01217
Plaintiff:
Michael Louis Overton
Defendant:
Access Securepak, California Men's Colony, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silva v. Access Securepak
as 1:2012cv02097
Plaintiff:
Justin Aurelio Silva
Defendant:
Access Securepak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Evans v. Access Securepak Company et al
as 2:2012cv09472
Defendant:
Access Securepak Company and Access Securepak Company
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Evans
Gore v. Walkenhorst's et al
as 5:2012cv05108
Plaintiff:
Samuel L. Gore
Defendant:
Walkenhorst's, Union Supply, Packages "R" Us and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roxanne Ari v. Amp' D Service Center, et al
as 11-18027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROXANNE ARI
Defendant - Appellee:
AMP' D SERVICE CENTER and ACCESS SECUREPAK
Braley v. Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, et al.
as 1:2011cv00522
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Braley
Defendant:
Access Securepak/Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, C.D.C.R., CSATF/SP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victor Correa v. Mike McDonald, et al
as 10-17751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR M. CORREA
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE MCDONALD, CARTER, C/O Property Officer and ACCESS SECUREPAK
Ari v. Amp'D Service Center et al
as 1:2010cv01134
Plaintiff:
Roxanne Ari
Defendant:
Amp'D Service Center and Access Securepak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correa v. McDonald et al
as 2:2010cv00531
Defendant:
Carter, Mike McDonald and Access Securepak
Plaintiff:
Victor M. Correa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
