Cases 11 - 20 of 4,723
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2947
Petitioner:
JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO, ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Blue Water Petroleum Corp. v. Atakam Group Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Blue Water Petroleum Corp.
Defendant:
Atakam Group Inc., Andrew Osichnuk aka Andrei Osichnuk and Alexander Dekhtyar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Blue Water Petroleum Corp. v. Atakam Group Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00203
Defendant:
Andrew Osichnuk, Atakam Group Inc., Andrei Osichnuk and others
Plaintiff:
Blue Water Petroleum Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Segovia-Coreas v. Garland
as 24-2823
Petitioner:
DARWIN ALEXANDER SEGOVIA-COREAS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Fujikura Composite America, Inc. v. Dee et al
as 3:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Fujikura Composite America, Inc.
Defendant:
Alexander Dee and 3V Performance LLC a California Limited Liability Company doing business as Aretera Golf
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
