Cases 11 - 20 of 165
Jayvion Ross v. Matthew Atchley
as 23-55182
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAYVION ROSS
Respondent / Appellee:
MATTHEW ATCHLEY
Brown v. Allen et al
as 3:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Brown
Defendant:
Acting Warden Trent Allen, Laura Eldridge, Dr. D. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Granval Hunter-Harrison , Jr. v. M. Atchley
as 22-17029
Petitioner / Appellant:
GRANVAL G. HUNTER-HARRISON, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
M. ATCHLEY, Warden
Shikeb Saddozai v. Connie Gipson, et al
as 22-16857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Defendant / Appellee:
CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, CDCR-Director of Department of Corrections, D. FARMER, Supervisor of Academic Instruction for SVSP, S. TOMLINSON, Senior Librarian Supervisor for SVSP and others
Adom v. CDCR et al
as 4:2022cv07150
Plaintiff:
Bilal Adom
Defendant:
CDCR, M. Atchley, Dr. Montegrande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrel Brannon v. Orozco, et al
as 22-16728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYREL GERRARD BRANNON
Defendant / Appellee:
OROZCO, Sgt., A. PACHECO, C/O, COVARRUBIAS, Sgt. and others
Baker v. Atchley et al
as 3:2022cv05825
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ray Baker
Defendant:
M. Atchley, T. Lemon, E. Borla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shikeb Saddozai v. A. Carwithen, et al
as 22-16482
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHIKEB SADDOZAI
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CARWITHEN, Correctional Officer, M. B. ATCHLEY, Warden, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and others
R. Murillo v. John Thich, et al
as 22-16374
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. MONA MURILLO
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN THICH, Correctional Sgt., E. BEAM, Correctional Lt., VERONICA LOMELI, Captain and others
Atchley v. Kelso Housing Authority
as 3:2022cv05607
Plaintiff:
Tammy Atchley
Defendant:
Kelso Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
