Cases 11 - 20 of 1,592
Jackson v. Pitt
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Carmela Lynn Jackson
Defendant:
William Brad Pitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sinkevitch v. Cain
as 24-2508
Petitioner:
BRETT A. SINKEVITCH
Respondent:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Hyper Ice, Inc. et al v. Bob and Brad, LLC
as 2:2024cv03212
Plaintiff:
Hyper Ice Inc. and Hyperice IP Subco LLC
Defendant:
Bob and Brad, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rumpler v. North Idaho College et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Laura Rumpler
Defendant:
North Idaho College, Tarie Zimmerman, Brad Corkill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Strain v. Pope et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Matthew William Strain
Defendant:
Brad Pope, Brian Powell and John Van Diver, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
B. v. Celtic Insurance Company dba Ambetter From MHS
as 4:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Brad B.
Defendant:
Celtic Insurance Company dba Ambetter From MHS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DeCastro v. Mcknight et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jose M DeCastro
Defendant:
Evan Mcknight, Pam Wagner, Brad Spoljaric and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson, et al. v. City of Portland, et al.
as 24-1663
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GIBSON and RUSSELL SCHULTZ
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH, MULTNOMAH COUNTY OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Shimkus v. Stanley
as 2:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Stan Shimkus
Defendant:
Brad Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
