Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Emily Garcia et al v. City of Tustin et al
as 8:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
Emily Garcia and C.G.
Defendant:
City of Tustin, Estella Silva and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pressgrove obo C.G. v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05998
Plaintiff:
Tracy Pressgrove obo C.G.
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roku, Inc. v. Universal Electronics, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00658
Defendant:
Gemstar Technology (Yangzhou) Co. Ltd., Gemstar Technology (Qinzhou) Co. Ltd., Universal Electronics BV and others
Plaintiff:
Roku, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
General Star Indemnity Company v. North American Indian Alliance-Butte et al
as 2:2021cv00022
Defendant:
A.S., C.G., C.M. and others
Plaintiff:
General Star Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.G. et al v. Juuls Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01602
Defendant:
McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
C.G. and Tanya Grover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goff v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00353
Plaintiff:
Emily Goff as the guardian of minor child C.G. and Emily Goff
Defendant:
James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC, Adam Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.G. v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
as 4:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit
Plaintiff:
C.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C.G v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
as 4:2021cv00098
Plaintiff:
C.G
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C.G. v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
as 4:2021cv00096
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit
Plaintiff:
C.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C.G. v. Bay Area Rapid Transit
as 4:2021cv00113
Defendant:
Bay Area Rapid Transit
Plaintiff:
C.G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
