Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Randall C.M. Whitney, et al v. Kyle EverettIn re: Randall C.M. Whitney, et al v. Kyle Everett
as 21-16923
Debtor:
In the Matter of: PACIFIC THOMAS CORPORATION
Appellant:
RANDALL C.M. WHITNEY
Appellee:
KYLE EVERETT, Chapter 11 Trustee
Busto v. Chevron
as 3:2021cv00142
Plaintiff:
C.M. Busto
Defendant:
Chevron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
In the Matter of C.M. v. Department of Education, Hawaii
as 1:2021cv00164
Defendant:
Christine Kishimoto and Department of Education, State of Hawaii
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of C.M., by and through his mother Lovelyn M.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
Busto v. The Honorable United States of America
as 3:2021cv00137
Defendant:
The Honorable United States of America
Plaintiff:
C.M. Busto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Lee-Zidek et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Defendant:
Sergeant Jeffrey Mane, Muriel Ah Cheong, SHU ACO's and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
General Star Indemnity Company v. North American Indian Alliance-Butte et al
as 2:2021cv00022
Defendant:
A.S., C.G., C.M. and others
Plaintiff:
General Star Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C.M. Busto v. City of Santa Barbara
as 2:2021cv02125
Defendant:
City of Santa Barbara
Plaintiff:
C.M. Busto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Busto v. City of San Diego
as 3:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
C.M. Busto
Defendant:
City of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Grandinetti v. HCF Visitation Room Officers and Staff et al
as 1:2021cv00035
Defendant:
HCF Visitation Room Officers and Staff, Public Defender, ACO Dante and others
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
