Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00272
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christopher Robinson v. Diversified Consultants, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00992
Defendant:
Diversified Consultants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
C.D.R.,et al v. United States of America
as 3:2017cv05301
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
C.D.R. , Sheena Robinson and Christopher Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Robinson v. Fusion Solutions, LLC
as 3:2013cv00652
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Fusion Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Michael Robinson v. P. Brazelton
as 12-73418
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON
Respondent:
P. D. BRAZELTON
Michael Robinson v. State of California
as 12-56169
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER ROBINSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
In Re: Midland Credit Management, Inc., Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation
as 3:2011md02286
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Zenoniani, Heather Moynihan, Cynthia Colacchia and others
Defendant:
Unidentified Collector, Midland Funding LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Special Master:
Honorable Herbert B. Hoffman
Petitioner:
Eunice Brooks and Vladimir Francois
Intervenor Plaintiff:
SEAN HARTRANFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Midland Funding, LLC
as 3:2010cv02261
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv00743
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
Joseph M. Arpaio and Supervisor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
