Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1
as 2:2015cv01432
Plaintiff:
Cobbler Nevada, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Cobbler Nevada, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2015cv01435
Plaintiff:
Cobbler Nevada, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOES 1-28
as 2:2015cv00576
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-39
as 2:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hunter v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2013cv02691
Plaintiff:
Demondza Hunter
Defendant:
OSC Chief John/Jane Doe 1, SSU, Special Agent in Charge John/Jane Doe 2, John/Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madriz et al v. King City Police Department et al
as 5:2013cv05096
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Madriz and Elizabeth Madriz
Defendant:
King City Police Department, King City, Nick Baldiviez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mohamed Refai v. USA, et al
as 13-15732
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMED MAJED CHEHADE REFAI
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DOES 1 THROUGH 25, INCLUSIVE, in their individual capacities;, DOES 26 THROUGH 60 INCLUSIVE, in their dividual and official Capacities and others
Hinkley v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05969
Plaintiff:
James M Hinkley
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Scott Russell, Kerry Arlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kiderlen v. Kane, et al.
as 1:2011cv01951
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Kiderlen
Defendant:
Pat Kane , John Doe #26 , Charles Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
