Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05635
Plaintiff:
David Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marcos-Chavela v. Graham et al
as 2:2022cv01035
Plaintiff:
Susan Marcos-Chavela
Defendant:
Lindsey Graham, Laura Bush, Ted Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sherrill v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Graham Sherrill
Defendant:
James Key, Riverce, Deunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sahm v. Onslow Bay Financial LLC et al
as 2:2019cv02090
Defendant:
US Bank National Association, Onslow Bay Financial LLC, Merscorp Holding Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Teri K Sahm and Teri Kealoha Sahm
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Laferriere v. Key et al
as 2:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Scott Laferriere, Sophia Laferriere and Graham Sherrill
Defendant:
James Key, Riverce, Deunich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akimoto & Zhu DDS MSD PLLC et al v. Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Akimoto & Zhu DDS MSD PLLC, Bret Jacobson, Carol OBrien DDS PS Inc and others
Defendant:
Travelers Casualty Insurance Company of America and The Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv05148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Graham v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Destiney Octavia Rebecca Graham
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
