Cases 11 - 20 of 596
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Card v. Alameda County District Attorney's Office
as 3:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Card
Defendant:
Alameda County District Attorney's Office, Alameda County Public Defender's Office, Pamela Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Goodman v. Reyes et al
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Travis Jack Goodman
Defendant:
Reyes and Donny Youngblood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodman v. Correctional Health Services et al
as 2:2023cv02463
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goodman
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Tena v. Goodman
as 4:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Miguel Tena, Jr.
Defendant:
Maribel Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keller v. Goodman et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Petitioner:
Gustave E. Keller
Respondent:
Judge Eric Goodman and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whipple v. Maricopa, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02238
Plaintiff:
Nathan Whipple
Defendant:
Maricopa, City of, Maricopa Police Department, Mark Goodman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dev Bhalla v. Elizabeth Goodman et al
as 2:2023cv08645
Plaintiff:
Dev Bhalla
Defendant:
Elizabeth Goodman, Sandra Scher, Aleksandr Vladimirovich Bible and others
Alexander Goodman v. Raul Campos
as 23-70176
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER C. GOODMAN
Respondent:
RAUL CAMPOS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
