Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Gonzalez v. Clark
as 1:2011cv01871
Petitioner:
Nicolas H. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gonzalez v. City of Fresno et al
as 1:2011cv01458
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Gonzalez
Defendant:
City of Fresno, Tamara Bogosian, James Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Salinas Valley State Prison
as 3:2011cv03397
Plaintiff:
Randy A. Hall
Defendant:
Salinas Valley State Prison, Mathew Cate, A. Hedgpeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Neotti et al
as 3:2011cv01050
Plaintiff:
Ryan E Porter
Defendant:
George Neotti, Hernandez, Seeley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armando Gonzalez-Galvez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-70629
Petitioner:
ARMANDO H. GONZALEZ-GALVEZ, AKA Armando Gonzales, AKA Armando Gonzalez, AKA Armando Gonzalez-Valenzuela
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Armando Ortiz v. Suzan Hubbard, et al
as 10-16474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARMANDO R. ORTIZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SUZAN HUBBARD, M. S. EVANS, M. MOORE and others
Ortiz v. Hubbard et al
as 4:2009cv05927
Plaintiff:
Armando R. Ortiz
Defendant:
Suzan Hubbard, M. S. Evans, M. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Loza-Gonzalez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-73869
Petitioner:
CARLOS HUMBERTO LOZA-GONZALEZ, AKA Carlos H. Gonzalez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Arthur Jackson v. J. Gonzalez, et al
as 09-56157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR DUANE JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. P. GONZALEZ, Associate Warden, J. A. GARCIA, Correctional Lieutenant, B. GOMEZ, Correctional Sergeant and others
Elias Gonzalez v. Grant County, et al
as 08-35998
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIAS H. GONZALEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J EARL, individually and in their official capacities, JOHN D. KNODELL, individually and in their official capacities, TIM SNEAD, individually and in their official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
