Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Himbler Aviles v. Jason Ur et al
as 2:2020cv02621
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Defendant:
Jason Ur, Heather L. Cohen, Thomas Joseph Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Himbler Aviles v. Heather L. Cohen et al
as 2:2019cv01937
Defendant:
Afsaneh Ashley Tabaddor, Sergeant E. Matusak, Jason Ur and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neel v. Santa Cruz Roundtree Homeowners Association
as 5:2019cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Neel
Defendant:
Santa Cruz Roundtree Homeowners Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Slavey v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv02056
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Slavey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g
Mack v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2018cv02863
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Alexander Wagstaff, Sacramento Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Allen Mack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Aviles v. George Chapman, et al
as 18-56167
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN HIMBLER AVILES, AKA Dean Aviles
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE CHAPMAN, On official capacity as Senior Special Agent FOS, FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTER, of Glynco, Georgia - A business premises, THOMAS J. SMITH, No. 9570047, as Federal Protective Service Inspector and others
Dean Himbler Aviles v. George Chapman et al
as 2:2018cv04260
Defendant:
Lynd Jason Allen, AFSANEH Tabaddor Ashley, George Chapman and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Himbler Aviles
Judith E. Owens et al v. Debra Hurst et al
as 5:2016cv02540
Defendant:
Elena Maria Boeva, Kelley Jean Bustos, County of Riverside and others
Plaintiff:
Drew McMaster, Shelly McMaster and Judith E Owens
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
