Cases 11 - 20 of 5,420
(PC) Jefferson v. Beam
as 2:2024cv00777
Plaintiff:
Tyrece Jefferson
Defendant:
Erik Beam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez de Rosales, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1379
Petitioner:
MARIA ESMERALDA MARTINEZ DE ROSALES, ISIDRO LEONEL ROSALES QUIJANO, BRYAN STEVEN ROSALES MARTINEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Epperson v. Deutsche Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Chris Epperson
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank, Lyndon B Johnson, Hary S. Truman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Oravetz v. Jefferson County Sheriffs et al
as 6:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Mark Oravetz
Defendant:
Jefferson County Sheriffs and Washinton State MSO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hildebrandt et al v. Lovik et al
as 6:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Cody Dean Hildebrandt, Jefferson Warren Davis and Tylor Setzer
Defendant:
Tina Lovik and Mark Braun
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jefferson Parish Schools v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Parish Schools
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., INSTAGRAM, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harel Talasazan v. Robert M. Farrell et al
as 2:2024cv01356
Defendant:
Attorney Poonam Patidar, Robert M. Farrell, Maria R. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Harel Talasazan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jefferson v. Kramer et al
as 2:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Ayana Jefferson
Defendant:
Jordan Kramer, Sara Broo, Melanie Aformsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petrozzi v. Inslee, et al.
as 24-689
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY ROBERT PETROZZI
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR, RONALD LEIGHTON, JAMES FLYNN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
