Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Hunter v. Attorney General for the State of California et al
as 1:2010cv00096
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of California, Department of Corrections Director, Ken Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godoy v. Wadsworth et al
as 1:2005cv02913
Plaintiff:
James Godoy
Defendant:
T. Wadsworth , Jean S. Woodford , S. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunter v. Attorney General State of California et al
as 1:2009cv01556
Plaintiff:
Leroy Dewitt Hunter
Defendant:
Attorney General State of California, Ken Clark, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prophet v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv01254
Plaintiff:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Defendant:
Ken Clark, J. Gallagher, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cortez v. Cate et al
as 5:2009cv03021
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Rudy Cortez
Defendant:
Mathew L. Cate, Richard J. Kirkland, Robert A. Horel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Vargas, et al.
as 1:2009cv01027
Plaintiff:
Charles A Rogers
Defendant:
S. Ponce, L. Polk and B. Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Rogers v. Ponce et al
as 1:2009at00445
Plaintiff:
Charles A Rogers
Defendant:
S Ponce and L. Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McCowen v. Clark et al
as 1:2009cv00664
Plaintiff:
Marcus Marcell McCowen
Defendant:
Ken Clark, S. Sherman, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCowen v. Clark et al
as 2:2009cv00895
Plaintiff:
Marcus Marcell McCowen
Defendant:
Ken Clark, S. Sherman, L. Polk and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Prophet v. Clark et al
as 1:2008cv01915
Plaintiff:
Joseph Danny Prophet
Defendant:
Ken Clark, G Wright, W. Wadkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
