Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Choice Hotels International, Inc. v. Shri Laxmi Naryan Hospitality Group of Sacramento, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01926
Defendant:
Shri Laxmi Naryan Hospitality Group of Sacramento, Inc. and Watkins/Sacramento Inn, LLC
Plaintiff:
Choice Hotels International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
World Wide Travel Inc. et al v. Travelmate US, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00155
Plaintiff:
World Wide Travel Incorporated , Usha Chand and Laxmi Chand
Defendant:
Tanya Doe, John Doe, Ritu Singla and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Laxmi Gautam v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-74221
Petitioner:
LAXMI GAUTAM
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Best Western International Incorporated v. Shree Laxmi Hotel LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02635
Plaintiff:
Best Western International Incorporated
Defendant:
Shree Laxmi Hotel LLC and Chintu K Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01534
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Best Western International Incorporated v. Laxmi Ganesha LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02715
Plaintiff:
Best Western International Incorporated
Defendant:
Laxmi Ganesha LLC, Shilpaben Patel and Ashok Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Pratap Dhungel, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-70160
Petitioner:
PRATAP KUMAR DHUNGEL and LAXMI DHUNGEL
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
In re: C & C Jewelry Mfg., Inc., et al v. Laxmi Jewel Inc., et al
as 09-60024
Debtor:
In re: C & C JEWELRY MFG., INC., a California corporation
Appellant:
C & C JEWELRY MFG., INC., a California corporation
Appellee:
LAXMI JEWEL INC., MILISTAR INC., LAXMI DIAMOND PVT. LTD. and others
Laxmi Pun v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-73966
Petitioner:
LAXMI PUN
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
