Cases 11 - 20 of 118
Bradshaw et al v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
as 3:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Philip Scott Bradshaw and Michael Wayne Bradshaw
Defendant:
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
Ahron Zilberstein v. Michael Wayne Peterson et al
as 5:2022cv01855
Plaintiff:
Ahron Zilberstein
Defendant:
Michael Wayne Peterson and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ronald Camp v. Michael Mason, et al
as 22-55900
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RONALD JAY CAMP
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE MASON, His Excellency and JANINE RAE CAMP
Defendant:
HER LADYSHIP
Ronald J. Camp v. Her Ladyship et al
as 2:2022cv05771
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jay Camp
Defendant:
Her Ladyship, Janine Rae Camp and His Excellency Michael Wayne Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Ronald J. Camp v. Her Ladyship et al
as 2:2022mc00152
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jay Camp
Defendant:
Her Ladyship, Janine Rae Camp and His Excellency Michael Wayne Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sprouse #188459 v. Shinn
as 2:2022cv01062
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Sprouse
Defendant:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Chastain v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-35084
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE CHASTAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Michael Wayne Houston v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv08758
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Houston
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Davis v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00283
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Davis
Respondent:
Arizona Board of Executive Clemency, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
USA v. Michael Pickering
as 21-30156
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL WAYNE PICKERING
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
