Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Stillsmoking v. Smail et al
as 4:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Nathan Stillsmoking
Defendant:
Brian Smail, Josh Garner, Philip Wilberding and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michel et al v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Ms. Powell, Mr. Vines, Mr. Madrid and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Redding, Thomas Gene Peltier, Ryan Denny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahseelah v. Mr. McTighe et al
as 4:2021cv00064
Defendant:
Ms. Alstead, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Montgomery and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Mahseelah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In the Matter of the Complaint of Nathan McDonough, as prior owner and/or owner pro hac vice of 1999 16' Skeeter Jon Boat
as 9:2020cv00159
Plaintiff:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Nathan McDonough, as prior owner and/or owner pro hac vice of 1999 16' Skeeter Jon Boat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Prochaska v. Contreraz et al
as 1:2020cv00101
Defendant:
John Pearson and Nathan Contreraz
Plaintiff:
Dalton Daniel Prochaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acord et al v. Open Mortgage
as 4:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Nathan Acord and Saibeen Acord
Defendant:
Open Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Debuf et al v. Hill et al
as 1:2017cv00024
Defendant:
Hill
Plaintiff:
Debuf and Russell Debuf
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Taurus J. Hill, Pacific West Construction, Inc and Pacific West Construction of Montana, Inc
3Rd Party Defendant:
Nathan Ryan Debuf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herrod v. Majority
as 1:2019cv00127
Plaintiff:
Nathan Herrod
Defendant:
Majority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Foster-Thompson et al
as 6:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Crystal Foster-Thompson, Nathan Charles, William Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Warden of Montana State Prison et al
as 6:2018cv00080
Defendant:
Hearings Officer, Montana State Prison, John Veilleux and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Fremont Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
