Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 329
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16534
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16532
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA and GLORIA COMEAUX
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Bonsignore Trial Lawyers, LLC, et al
as 22-16678
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION and CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellant: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellee: BONSIGNORE TRIAL LAWYERS, LLC, GRAY ECHAVARRIA, GLORIA COMEAUX and others
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 22-16537
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Appellant: LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-16699
Petitioner / Appellant: HARRY GARAVANIAN, CHRIS SEUFERT, KERRY MURPHY and others
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 20-15704
Defendant / Appellee: TOSHIBA AMERICA CONSUMER PRODUCTS, LLC, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, SAMSUNG SDI (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Not Classified By Court: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Petitioner / Appellant: ELEANOR LEWIS, Proposed Intervenor
Flextronics International USA, v. Panasonic Corporation, et al
as 22-15231
Plaintiff / Appellant: FLEXTRONICS INTERNATIONAL USA, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: PANASONIC CORPORATION, PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, PANASONIC ELECTRONIC DEVICES CO. LTD. and others
Defendant: MURATA MANUFACTURING CO., LTD., MURATA ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA, INC., MURATA POWER SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00032
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
IN RE CAPACITORS ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv03264
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Mouser Electronics, Inc., Gossett Motor Cars, Inc. and others
Defendant: Shizuki Electric Co., Inc., Kemet Corporation, NEC Tokin America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Digi-Key Corporation, Quathimatine Holdings, Inc. and Five Rivers Electronic Innovations, LLC
Intervenor: United States of America
Not Classified By Court: Satoshi Okubo
Respondent: Cambridge Capital Corporation
Interested Party: Schuten Electronics, Inc. and Top Floor Home Improvements
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Panasonic Corporation of North America v. Powertree Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01012
Defendant: Danlin Corporation, Powertree Services, Inc. and Powertree San Francisco One, LLC
Plaintiff: PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?