Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Gregory Franklin v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2019cv06255
Defendant:
Correctional Officer D. Moore, E. Delgadillo, Lieutenant A. H. Martinez and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2019cv04107
Defendant:
R. Clemons, Alan W. Cox, D. Ulstad and others
Plaintiff:
Henry C Hayes and Henry C. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv03160
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Jerald R Franklin and Denise Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony Hoskins v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2019cv02414
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hoskins
Defendant:
T. Lewandowski and R. Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Monsanto Company
as 2:2019cv01805
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Jerald R Franklin and Denise Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Franklin et al
as 3:2018cv02542
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board, Carolyn L. Wynne, Marsi R. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Richard Owens v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2018cv09281
Defendant:
S. Marolla, D. Washington, A. Christinsen and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Washington v. A. Ayon, et al
as 18-56078
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE WASHINGTON
Defendant - Appellee:
A. AYON, Correctional Officer, sued in their individual capacity, X. CANO, Chief Deputy Warden, sued in their individual capacity, R. FRANKLIN, Lieutenant, sued in their individual capacity and others
Richard Owens v. Soto et al
as 2:2018cv01108
Defendant:
A. Christinsen, R Franklin, -, S Marolla and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens
Richard Owens v. R. Franklin et al
as 2:2017cv08910
Defendant:
Correctional Officer A. Christinsen, Correctional Officer A. Christinsen, Sergeant R. Franklin and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Owens
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
