Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Harshman v. Beistline et al
as 3:2018cv00174
Defendant: Ralph R. Beistline and Marci Lundgren
Plaintiff: Floyd E. Harshman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Beistline
as 3:2017cv00005
Plaintiff: Theodore T. Johnson
Defendant: Ralph R. Beistline
Movant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv05481
Plaintiff: National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) , Brandon M. Felton , Jose J. Garcia and others
Defendant: United States of America , Barack Obama, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2011cv05481
Plaintiff: National Association for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice (NAAMJP) , Brandon M. Felton , Jose J. Garcia and others
Defendant: United States of America, Barack Obama, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frank Steffensen v. City of Fairbanks, et al
as 09-35475
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANK STEFFENSEN
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF FAIRBANKS, JOHN MERRION, BURLYN RIGDON and others
Hymes v. Beistline et al
as 4:2008cv00051
Plaintiff: Donald Louis Hymes
Defendant: Ralph R. Beistline, John W. Sedwick, Stephen Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Other Statutes None
Hymes v. Beistline
as 4:2008cv00026
Plaintiff: Donald Louis Hymes
Defendant: Ralph R. Beistline
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Helen M. Smith v. John W. Sedwick, et al
as 3:2007cv00025
Plaintiff: Helen M. Smith
Defendant: John W. Sedwick, Ralph R. Beistline, Timothy M. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?