Cases 11 - 20 of 8,804
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rodriguez v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00927
Plaintiff:
Candy M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Rodriguez Dominguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3113
Petitioner:
MARICELA ELIZABETH RODRIGUEZ DOMINGUEZ, KIMBERLY MICHELLE MORAN RODRIGUEZ and CHRISS ENRIQUE MORAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodriguez-Aparicio, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3085
Petitioner:
SILVIA JULIANA RODRIGUEZ-APARICIO and JULIAN ESTEBAN RODRIGUEZ-APARICIO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flickinger v. Castillo et al
as 5:2024cv02915
Plaintiff:
Jason Archie Flickinger
Defendant:
Jaqueline Reyes Castillo, Robert Crisp, Pedro Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cristina Rodriguez v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv03991
Plaintiff:
Cristina Rodriguez
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Vaquiz-Rodriguez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2999
Petitioner:
KAREN VAQUIZ-RODRIGUEZ and BRIHANA LOBO-VAQUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gesell v. Cottonwood, City of et al
as 3:2024cv08090
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gesell
Defendant:
Cottonwood, City of, Tim Elinski, Jesus Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. Key Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Kay Rodriguez
Defendant:
Key Insurance Company and Med James, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
