Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Royster v. First Horizon Home Loans et al
as 3:2011cv02077
Plaintiff:
Darren Royster
Defendant:
First Horizon Home Loans, First Tennessee Bank National Association , Metlife Home Loans Servicing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Royster v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv01151
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Royster
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, Sturges, True and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Royster v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv01061
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W. Royster
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, R. Lee, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royster v. Public Health Services et al
as 2:2011cv01060
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Royster
Defendant:
Public Health Services, Steven Lange and Benjamin Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James M Royster v. Michael J Astrue
as 2:2011cv03309
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
James M Royster
Juror Number One v. State of California et al
as 2:2011cv00397
Plaintiff:
Juror Number One
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. , George Christian, Tommy Cornelius, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
juror number one v. State of California et al
as 2:2011at00192
Plaintiff:
juror number one
Defendant:
State of California, Michael P. Kenny, Facebook, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David M. Royster v. Mortgageit Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00262
Defendant:
Bank of America NA, Does, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
David M Royster
Financial Federal Credit Inc v. Overex Construction Inc et al
as 5:2010mc00008
Plaintiff:
Financial Federal Credit Inc
Defendant:
Overex Construction Inc and Andrew K Royster
Shirley L. Williams et al v. Ocwen Financial et al
as 2:2010cv01801
Plaintiff:
Lisa Cheadle, Roslin Dear, Linda Hogan and others
Defendant:
Does, Ocwen Financial, Ocwen Financial Solutions Private Limited and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
