Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Western Pacific Distributing, LLC v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc. et al
as 8:2021cv00591
Defendant:
Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Ryder System, Inc. and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Western Pacific Distributing, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Westpac Materials
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00076
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Northwest Administrators Inc v. Ryder System Inc
as 2:2019cv00773
Plaintiff:
Northwest Administrators Inc
Defendant:
Ryder System Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Kimbo v. MXD Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00166
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kimbo
Defendant:
MXD Group, Inc. and RYDER System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mickey Dilts, et al v. Penske Logistics LLC, et al
as 12-55705
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, INC., RYDER SYSTEM, INC., TRUCKLOAD CARRIERS ASSOCIATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY RIOS, MICKEY LEE DILTS and DONNY DUSHAJ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
DOES 1-125, inclusive, PENSKE LOGISTICS LLC and PENSKE TRUCK LEASING CO LP, a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-15530
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv08090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
David Hirsch v. Afshin Corporation, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv06782
Defendant:
Calmet Services, Inc., Koosed Enterprises, Inc., Brotman Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
David Hirsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0901 Comprehensive Response, Compensation & Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
