Cases 11 - 20 of 76
Stahls' Inc. v. California Global Signs Information Technology Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05667
Plaintiff:
Stahls' Inc. a Michigan corporation doing business as GroupeSTAHL
Defendant:
California Global Signs Information Technology Co., Inc. and Beijing Chinasigns Information Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Stahls Inc. v. Toolots, Inc.
as 2:2021cv05609
Petitioner:
STAHLS' INC dba GroupeSTAHL
Plaintiff:
Stahls Inc. doing business as GroupeStahl, a Michigan corporation
Defendant:
Toolots, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Zack Coryellbattle, et al v. City of Maricopa, et al
as 21-15362
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK HORST, SOTO, Officer, MARICOPA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZACK CORYELLBATTLE
Plaintiff:
GAYLA CORYELLBATTLE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Keith A. Stahl v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2020cv01132
Plaintiff:
Keith Stahl
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Secruity Administration and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Stahl v. Haynes
as 2:2020cv00486
Petitioner:
Courtney James Stahl
Respondent:
Ron Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stahl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv06003
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jason Stahl
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brill et al v. Postle et al
as 2:2019cv02027
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Sluzinski, Thomas Morris III, Adam Duong and others
Defendant:
King's Casino, LLC, Justin F Kuraitis, Michael L Postle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00870
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
