Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 97
Save the Colorado, et al v. USDOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-15247
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAVE THE COLORADO, LIVING RIVERS and CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATION, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Aparna Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services, LLC, et al
as 22-56118
Plaintiff / Appellant: APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, a Utah limited liability company, CHRIS HOWELL, an individual, JUSTIN SPENCER, an individual and others
Andrew Valles v. Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y) et al
as 2:2022cv06954
Petitioner: Andrew Valles
Respondent: Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y), Attorney General of the State of California (S.D.Cal.) and Attorney General of the State of Utah (D.UT.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amann v. Attorney General of the State of Utah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022mc08003
In Re: Wanda Amann
Plaintiff: Paul G Amann
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Utah, Sean Reyes, Bridget Romano and others
The United States v. State of Idaho We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff: The United States and United States of America
Defendant: State of Idaho
Intervenor Defendant: Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives Scott Bedke, Idaho Senate President Pro Tempore Chuck Winder, and the Sixty-Sixth Idaho Legislature
Amicus Curiae: New York, State of, California, State of, Connecticut, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
In re: Washington Cattlemen's Association, et al v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70194
Not Classified By Court: In re: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCAITION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Valles v. Attorney Genereal of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01375
Plaintiff: Andrew Valles
Defendant: Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General of the State of California and Attorney General of the State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16096
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
State of California, et al v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16095
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WASHINGTON CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
ALDF v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-16100
Plaintiff / Appellee: ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, GINA RAIMONDO, U.S. Secretary of Commerce and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?