Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2014mc00322
Defendant: Alan Clark Holdings, LLC, FHTM Canada, Inc., FHTM, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2014mc00563
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of Illinois, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., FHTM, Inc., Alan Clark Holdings, LLC and others
Receiver: Robb Evans & Robb Evans and Associates, LLC
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al
as 2:2014ms00033
Defendant: Alan Clark Holdings, LLC, FHTM Canada, Inc., FHTM, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Federal Trade Commission, State Of North Carolina and others
Receiver: Robb Evans
In re Lidoderm Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2014md02521
Plaintiff: United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Local 17 Hospitality Benefit Fund and others
Defendant: Teikoku Pharma USA, Teikoku Seiyaku Co, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Not Classified By Court: All Parties, Express Scripts, Inc., Caremark, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of Missouri, et al v. Harris We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00341
Defendant: Kamala D. Harris and Karen Ross
Plaintiff: State of Missouri , State of Nebraska , State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 4:2012mc80286
Plaintiff: United States of America , State of Alabama , State of Alaska and others
Defendant: Bank of America Corporation , Bank of America, N.A. , Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. and others
The State of California et al v. Winbond Electronics Co.
as 3:2007cv02589
Plaintiff: The State of California, The State of Alaska, The State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Winbond Electronics Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01347
Plaintiff: State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2007cv01347
Plaintiff: State of California, State of Alaska, State of Arizona and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Semiconductor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?